Oszacowanie śladu węglowego domu jednorodzinnego wykorzystującego bardziej ekologiczne i innowacyjne materiały / Carbon Footprint Estimation of a Single-Family House implementing Greener and Innovative Materials


Marie-Lou D’Ercole, Łukasz Szarek, Piotr Manczarski

DOI: 10.15199/17.2025.7-8.6, GWiTS 7-8/2025, lipiec-sierpień 2025

Pobierz PDF (Open Access)


Abstract:
The construction industry is a large contributor to climate change, but it also presents an opportunity to positively affect changes through innovation in the built environment. It can include new forms of construction that are cleaner and more environmentally friendly, and which support a reduction of waste, different methods to work with innovative materials and find more effective solutions to store renewable energy. This work provides an example of a single-family house located in Tarnów, Poland, incorporating greener and innovative construction materials (recycled plastic bricks, hemp wool, hempcrete and wood), for which the carbon footprint is estimated. The materials selection was focused on the reduction of traditional materials, including concrete and fiberglass.

Keywords: carbon footprint, materials of construction.

Streszczenie:
Branża budowlana w dużym stopniu przyczynia się do zmian klimatycznych, co stanowi również okazję do wprowadzenia pozytywnych zmian poprzez innowacje. Mogą one obejmować nowe formy budownictwa, które są czystsze, bardziej ekologiczne i pomagają zmniejszyć ilość odpadów, różne metody wykorzystania nowych materiałów oraz lepsze sposoby magazynowania energii odnawialnej. Niniejsza praca przedstawia przykład domu jednorodzinnego zlokalizowanego w Tarnowie w Polsce, w którym zastosowano bardziej ekologiczne i innowacyjne materiały budowlane (cegły z recyklingowanego plastiku, wełnę konopną, beton konopny i drewno), dla którego oszacowano ślad węglowy. Wybór materiałów skupił się na redukcji tradycyjnych materiałów, w tym betonu i włókna szklanego.

Słowa kluczowe: ślad węglowy, materiały budowlane.


Bibliografia

[1] András Polgár. 2023. “Carbon footprint and sustainability assessment of wood utilisation in Hungary.” Environment, Development and Sustainability. 26: 1-25.

[2] Antti Ruuska (ed.). 2013. “Carbon footprint for building products. ECO2 data for materials and products with the focus on wooden building products.” VTT Technology. 115.

[3] Bell, J. E., Brown, C. L., Conlon, K., Herring, S., Kunkel, K. E., Lawrimore, J., … Uejio, C. 2018. “Changes in extreme events and the potential impacts on human health.” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 68 (4): 265–287.

[4] 2023. Carbon Cloud. https://apps.carboncloud.com/climatehub/product-reports/id/129788136423

[5] Center for Environmental Studies, Florida Atlantic University, NASA Innovations in Climate Education. 2023. “How the Greenhouse Effect Works.” https://www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/module-2/how-greenhouse-effect-works.php

[6] 2018. Chatham house. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2018/06/making-concrete-change-innovation-low-carbon-cement-and-concrete

[7] D.Z. Li, H.X. Chen, Eddie C.M. Hui,J.B Zhang, Q.M Li. 2012. “Amethodology for estimating the life-cycle carbon efficiency of a residential building.” Building and Environment. 59: 448-455.

[8] 2008. Ecological building systems. https://www.ecologicalbuildingsystems.com/product/thermo-hemp-combi-jute

[9] Erdem Cuce, Pinar Mert Cuce, Emre Alvur, Yusuf Nadir Yilmaz, Shaik Saboor, Ilker Ustabas, Emanoil Linul, Mohammad Asif. 2023. “Experimental performance assessment of a novel insulation plaster as an energy-efficient retrofit solution for external walls: A key building material towards low/zero carbon buildings.” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 49.

[10] Flavio Scrucca, Carlo Ingrao, Chadi Maalouf, Tala Moussa, Guillaume Polidori, Antonio Messineo b, Claudia Arcidiacono, Francesco Asdrubali. 2020. “Energy and carbon footprint assessment of production of hemp hurds for application in buildings.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 84.

[11] Ilija Bošković, Ana Radivojević. 2023. “Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of hemp-lime concrete wall constructions in Serbia: The impact of carbon sequestration, transport, waste production and end of life biogenic carbon emission.” Journal of Building Engineering. 66.

[12] Jere Komsi, Helsinki Metropolia. 2018. “Thermal Properties of Hempcrete, a case study.” Theseus theses and publications of the Universities of Applied Sciences.

[13] John Orr, Orlando Gibbons, Will Arnold. 2020. “A brief guide to calculating embodied carbon.” The Structural Engineer. 98 (7): 6.

[14] José M P Sala Lizarraga,Ana Picallo-Perez. 2020. Exergy Analysis and Thermoeconomics of Buildings, 10 – Sustainability and exergy in buildings: 791-843.

[15] 1997. “Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.” 2303 UNTS 148.

[16] Łukasz Szarek, Łukasz Krysiak, Zbigniew Kledyński, Agnieszka Machowska, Paweł Falaciński. 2023. “Durability, carbon footprint and contaminant immobilization in self-hardening slurries applied to cut-off walls: a review.” Archives of Civil Engineering. 69 (3): 5-29.

[17] 2008. Matériaux naturels. https://www.materiaux-naturels.fr/produit-liste/12-isolation-chanvre

[18] 2024. Our World in Data.

[19] Polish Cement Association. 2020. “Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) – Cements CEM I, CEM II, CEM III, CEM IV, CEM V Produced in Poland.” Building Research Institute (Instytut Techniki Budowlanej – ITB) (Building Research Institute (Instytut Techniki Budowlanej – ITB)).

[20] Prathik Kulkarni, Vikas Ravekar, P. Rama Rao, Sahil Waigokar, Sanket Hingankar. 2022. “Recycling of waste HDPE and PP plastic in preparation of plastic brick and its mechanical properties.” Cleaner Materials. 5.

[21] 2023. “Rozporządzenie Ministra Rozwoju i Technologii z dnia 28 marca 2023 r. zmieniające rozporządzenie w sprawie metodologii wyznaczania charakterystyki energetycznej budynku lub części budynku oraz świadectw charakterystyki energetycznej.” Dz.U. 2023 poz. 697.

[22] Saint-Gobain. 2025. “Ślad węglowy domu jednorodzinnego pod lupą.”

[23] 2024. Solaris renewables. https://solarisrenewables.com/blog/what-is-the-carbon-footprint-of-solar-panel-manufacturing/

[24] 2013. The engineering toolbox. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wood- -density-d_40.html

[25] 2024. UN Environment programme. https://renewableinstitute.org/images/unep%20info%20sheet%20-%20ee%20buildings.pdf

[26] V. Gryc, P. Horáček. 2007. “Variability in density of spruce wood with the presence of reaction wood.” Journal of Forest Science. 53 (3): 129-137.

[27] 2014. World data. https://www.worlddata.info/europe/poland/energy-consumption.php#google_vignette

[28] 2016. World green building council. https://worldgbc.org/advancing-net-zero/embodied-carbon/

[29] Y. Florentin, D. Pearlmutter, B. Givoni, E. Gal. 2017. “A life-cycle energy and carbon analysis of hemp-lime bio-composite building materials.” Energy and Buildings. 156: 293-305.

[30] ZhongjiaChen, Hongmei Gu,Richard D.Bergman, Shaobo Liang. 2020. “Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment of a High-Rise Mass Timber Building with an Equivalent Reinforced ConcreteAlternative Using theAthena Impact Estimator for Buildings.” Sustainability. 12 (11): 4708.

[31] Zima, K. 2021. “Integrated analysis of costs and amount of greenhouse gases emissions during the building lifecycle.” Archives of Civil Engineering. 67 (2): 413-423.